In re Woltz

Fourth Circuit

In re Woltz

427 F. App'x 271

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Woltz. Read the opinion of the Court — 325 F. App'x 232 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2011·No. No. 11-1211·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Howell Way Woltz petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order removing the district court judge from his case due to alleged bias. However, Woltz previously sought the same relief via a petition for a writ of mandamus, which we denied. See In re Woltz, 325 Fed.Appx. 232, 233 (4th Cir.2009) (unpublished). Accordingly, Woltz’s mandamus petition is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Howell Way Woltz petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order removing the district court judge from his case due to alleged bias. However, Woltz previously sought the same relief via a petition for a writ of mandamus, which we denied. See In re Woltz, 325 Fed.Appx. 232, 233 (4th Cir.2009) (unpublished). Accordingly, Woltz’s mandamus petition is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Woltz, 427 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

427 F. App'x 271 (In re Woltz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related