In re Winograd
178 A.D.2d 313, 576 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Winograd. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.2d 214 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 19, 1991·Published
Opinion
Respondent’s application for reinstatement is granted, and respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York forthwith. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Winograd, 178 A.D.2d 313, 576 N.Y.S.2d 794, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).
178 A.D.2d 313 (In re Winograd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.