In re Winograd
154 A.D.2d 277, 547 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13371
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Winograd. Read the opinion of the Court — 148 A.D.2d 214 →
Opinion
— Motion granted to the extent of referring this matter to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department for a hearing pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (h); and the suspension of respondent is continued pending receipt by this court of the report of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, and the further order of this court. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Sullivan, Ross and Carro, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Winograd, 154 A.D.2d 277, 547 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13371 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
154 A.D.2d 277 (In re Winograd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 90
New York JUD § 90(4)(h)