in Re William B. Ozer, Relator

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 28, 2010·No. 04-10-00527-CV·Published

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00527-CV

IN RE William B. OZER

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 28, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 19, 2010, relator William B. Ozer filed a petition for writ of mandamus. However,

in order to be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show the trial court clearly abused its

discretion and relator has no adequate remedy at law. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d

124, 135 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). The court has

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought

because relator has failed to address whether he has an adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly,

1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-18567, styled William B. Ozer v. Todd Gold, et al., pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding. 04-10-00527-CV

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. TEX . R. APP . P.

52.8(a).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re William B. Ozer, Relator, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re William B. Ozer, Relator (in Re William B. Ozer, Relator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)