in Re William B. Ozer, Relator
This text of in Re William B. Ozer, Relator (in Re William B. Ozer, Relator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00527-CV
IN RE William B. OZER
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 28, 2010
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On July 19, 2010, relator William B. Ozer filed a petition for writ of mandamus. However,
in order to be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must show the trial court clearly abused its
discretion and relator has no adequate remedy at law. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d
124, 135 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). The court has
considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought
because relator has failed to address whether he has an adequate remedy by appeal. Accordingly,
1 … This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2009-CI-18567, styled William B. Ozer v. Todd Gold, et al., pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Janet Littlejohn presiding. 04-10-00527-CV
relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. TEX . R. APP . P.
52.8(a).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re William B. Ozer, Relator, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-william-b-ozer-relator-texapp-2010.