In Re Western Asbestos Co.

313 B.R. 456, 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1504, 2004 WL 1908148
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
DecidedJanuary 27, 2004
Docket17-40092
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 313 B.R. 456 (In Re Western Asbestos Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Western Asbestos Co., 313 B.R. 456, 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1504, 2004 WL 1908148 (Cal. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER CONFIRMING SECOND AMENDED JOINT PLAN OF REORGANIZATION AND GRANTING RELATED RELIEF 1

LESLIE TCHAIKOVSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came before the Court upon the request for confirmation of the “Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization” (the “Plan”) 2 filed November 18, 2003, by Western Asbestos Company (“Western Asbestos”), Western MacArthur Co. (“Western MacArthur”) and Mac Arthur Co. (“Mac Arthur”), the debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned cases (collectively, the “Debtors”); the Official Unsecured Creditors’ Committee in the above-captioned cases (the “Committee”); and the Honorable Charles B. Renfrew, the legal representative appointed by this Court to represent the interests of future asbestos claimants in the above-captioned cases (the “Futures Representative” and collectively with the Debtors and the Committee, the “Proponents”).

As part of the confirmation process, on October 31, 2003, this Court entered its “Memorandum of Decision Re Confirmation Legal Issues” (the “Memorandum of Decision”) and on December 5, 2003, entered its interlocutory “Order Summarily Adjudicating Certain Confirmation Issues” (the “Partial Summary Judgment Order”). The Partial Summary Judgment Order is hereby adopted as a final order of this Court and shall be deemed entered as a final order as of the date of entry of this Confirmation Order.

In addition, on January 20, 2004, this Court entered its “Order Under Fed. R.Bankr.P. 9019 Approving (1) Compromise And Settlement Agreement With Hartford, And (2) Certain Agreements Ancillary To Hartford Settlement Agreement” (the “Hartford Approval Order”), which Order approved the “Settlement Agreement And Release” (the “Hartford Settlement”) embodying a settlement agreement with Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (“Hartford”), which included a release of the Hartford Released Parties. Because of the Hartford Settlement and the Hartford Approval Order, Hartford has conditionally withdrawn all of its objections to confirmation. As a result, the only parties opposing confirmation of *458 the Plan are: (a) General Accident Insurance Company of America, now known as OneBeacon Insurance Company (“General Accident”), (b) Argonaut Insurance Company (“Argonaut”), and (c) United States Fire Insurance Company (“U.S. Fire” and collectively with General Accident and Argonaut, the “Objecting Insurers”). No creditors have opposed confirmation of the Plan.

After notice, a trial was held on confirmation of the Plan, which commenced on November 10, 2003, and proceeded over a several week period (the “Confirmation Hearing”). Appearances at the Confirmation Hearing were as noted in the record. Upon consideration of the record of the Confirmation Hearing (including all testimony proffered and exhibits admitted into evidence) and upon all pleadings heretofore filed and all proceedings heretofore conducted in the above-captioned chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”), this Court entered its “Memorandum Of Decision After Confirmation Hearing” (the “Confirmation Decision”). For the reasons set forth in both the Memorandum of Decision and the Confirmation Decision, after due deliberation and good and sufficient cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT:

A. General Decrees and Implementation.

1. The Plan, a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit “A”, is hereby confirmed as modified by this Order, including as provided in Paragraph R.59, infra.

2. All objections to Confirmation of the Plan, other than those withdrawn in writing prior to, or on the record at, the Confirmation Hearing, and other than those in respect of which the Court made rulings during the Confirmation Hearing, are hereby overruled.

3. Consistent with the Plan, the following agreements and documents, and all amendments, modifications and supplements thereto (which agreements and documents shall be substantially in the respective forms attached as exhibits to the Plan or as filed with the Court on October 24, 2003), including, without limitation, all annexes, exhibits, and schedules thereto, and all terms and conditions thereof, are hereby determined to be fair and reasonable and are hereby approved: (a) the “Glossary Of Terms For The Plan Documents;” (b) the “Western Asbestos Settlement Trust Agreement;” (c) the “Trust Bylaws;” (d) the “Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust Distribution Procedures;” (e) the “Case Valuation Matrix;” (f) the “Mac Arthur Note;” (g) the “Mac Arthur Pledge Agreement;” (h) the “Mac Arthur Business Loss Insurance Security;” and (i) the “Mac Arthur General Insurance Security.” Without need for further order or authorization of the Bankruptcy Court, the Proponents, the Debtors after the Effective Date (the “Reorganized Debtors”), the Trust and the Trustees, and the TAC are hereby authorized and empowered to make any and all modifications to any and all documents included as part of the Plan Documents to the extent authorized by such Plan Documents.

4. All non-Class 4 Claims against the Debtors and all common stock Interests in the Debtors shall be unimpaired, except that the Trust shall acquire all of the common stock of Western Asbestos, and the common stock Interests of Mac Arthur shall be subject to the terms of the Mac Arthur Pledge Agreement.

5. The Proponents, the Reorganized Debtors, the Trust and the Trustees, the TAC, the Futures Representative and any other party whose cooperation is needed in connection with the Plan, are authorized and required to take all steps necessary *459 and to execute, deliver, file or record such contracts, instruments, releases, and other agreements or documents and take such actions as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate and further evidence the terms and conditions of the Plan, including to establish the Trust, qualify it as a settlement fund within the meaning of section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations issued pursuant thereunder, receive the Trust Assets, issue and distribute the Mac Arthur Note, the Mac Arthur Pledge Agreement, the Mac Arthur Business Loss Insurance Security, and the Mac Arthur General Insurance Security, issue stock of Western Asbestos to the Trust, pay any fees due the Office of the United States Trustee (“U.S.Trustee”), and otherwise consummate the Plan upon the satisfaction of all conditions to the occurrence of the Effective Date. The Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President or any Vice President of any of the Debtors or, in the case of Western Asbestos, any of its directors or Amy Matthew, the Court-appointed responsible individual, shall be authorized to act on behalf of the Debtors with respect to the foregoing.

6. All matters provided for under the Plan involving the corporate structure of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, or any corporate action to be taken by, or required of the Debtors or Reorganized Debtors, shall be deemed to have occurred and be effective as provided in the Plan, and shall be authorized and approved in all respects without any requirement for further action by the stockholders or directors of such entities.

7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Snyder v. Cal. Ins. Guarantee Assn.
California Court of Appeal, 2014
Snyder v. California Insurance Guarantee Assn.
229 Cal. App. 4th 1196 (California Court of Appeal, 2014)
In re W.R. Grace & Co.
475 B.R. 34 (D. Delaware, 2012)
In Re Federal-Mogul Global Inc.
385 B.R. 560 (D. Delaware, 2008)
In Re Pittsburgh Corning Corp.
417 B.R. 289 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 2006)
Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Highlands Insurance
38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716 (California Court of Appeal, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 B.R. 456, 2004 Bankr. LEXIS 1504, 2004 WL 1908148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-western-asbestos-co-canb-2004.