In re Weitzman
862 A.2d 588, 580 Pa. 559
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 2004·No. No. 563 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplin[560]*560ary Board dated September 17, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. We further direct Office of Disciplinary Counsel to consider any future non-payment of tax liability as a ground for discipline.
Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Weitzman, 862 A.2d 588, 580 Pa. 559 (Pa. 2004).
862 A.2d 588 (In re Weitzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.