In re Weitzman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Weitzman

862 A.2d 588

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 2004·No. No. 563 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated September 17, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. We further direct Office of Disciplinary Counsel to consider any future non-payment of tax liability as a ground for discipline.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2004, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated September 17, 2004, the Petition for Reinstatement is granted. We further direct Office of Disciplinary Counsel to consider any future non-payment of tax liability as a ground for discipline.

Pursuant to Rule 218(e), Pa.R.D.E., petitioner is directed to pay the expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement.

In re Weitzman, 862 A.2d 588 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

862 A.2d 588 (In re Weitzman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.