in Re Wayne Ernest Barker

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00085-CV

IN RE WAYNE ERNEST BARKER

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Wayne Ernest Barker, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. There

are procedural problems with the petition, but we use Rule 2 to look beyond those

problems and deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing

fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to

TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See

also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §

51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under these

circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable

of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Barker.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed March 10, 2010 [OT06]

In re Barker Page 2