in Re Wayne Ernest Barker
This text of in Re Wayne Ernest Barker (in Re Wayne Ernest Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10-00085-CV
IN RE WAYNE ERNEST BARKER
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Wayne Ernest Barker, an inmate, filed a petition for writ of mandamus. There
are procedural problems with the petition, but we use Rule 2 to look beyond those
problems and deny the petition. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2.
Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing
fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to
TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See
also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §
51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under these
circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable
of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Barker.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Reyna, and Justice Davis Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed March 10, 2010 [OT06]
In re Barker Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Wayne Ernest Barker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wayne-ernest-barker-texapp-2010.