in Re Wayne Ernest Barker
This text of in Re Wayne Ernest Barker (in Re Wayne Ernest Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion filed November 17, 2011
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals __________
No. 11-11-00323-CV __________
IN RE WAYNE ERNEST BARKER
Original Mandamus Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Wayne Ernest Barker, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of Hon. Kenneth H. Keeling, Judge of the 278th District Court, with respect to relator’s filing of a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act in Walker County. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(b)(1) (West 2004) provides that each court of appeals for a court of appeals district may issue all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs, “against a . . . judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district.” Walker County is not in the Eleventh Court of Appeals District nor are Leon or Madison Counties, the other counties comprising the 278th District Court. TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(l) (West Supp. 2011); see TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 24.455 (West Supp. 2011). Instead, these counties are in the Tenth Court of Appeals District. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(k) (West Supp. 2011). Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against the Judge of the 278th District Court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
November 17, 2011 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., McCall, J., and Kalenak, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Wayne Ernest Barker, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-wayne-ernest-barker-texapp-2011.