In re Warren E. Brown

80 A.3d 683, 2013 WL 6230074
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 27, 2013
Docket13-BG-1266
StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.3d 683 (In re Warren E. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Warren E. Brown, 80 A.3d 683, 2013 WL 6230074 (D.C. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of Bar Counsel’s report regarding petitioner’s petition for reinstatement, wherein Bar Counsel informs the court that Mr. Brown has demonstrated that he is fit to resume the practice of law, and the petition for reinstatement, and it appearing that petitioner filed his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit on January 28, 2013, and therefore is eligible to file the petition for reinstatement, see In re Brown, 694 A.2d 886 (D.C.1997), it is

ORDERED that petitioner’s petition for reinstatement is granted. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Warren E. Brown, Esquire is hereby reinstated to the Bar of the District of Columbia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Brown
694 A.2d 886 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A.3d 683, 2013 WL 6230074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-warren-e-brown-dc-2013.