In re Brown

694 A.2d 886, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 114, 1997 WL 290156
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1997·No. No. 96-BG-1345·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this reciprocal discipline proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that respondent be suspended for sixty days and required to show fitness before he is allowed to return to the practice of law in this jurisdiction.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, 694 A.2d 886, 1997 D.C. App. LEXIS 114, 1997 WL 290156 (D.C. 1997).

694 A.2d 886 (In re Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Warren E. Brown
80 A.3d 683 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2013)