In re Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Walker

2001 Ohio 1327, 93 Ohio St. 3d 211

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 19, 2001

Docket2001-0445

StatusPublished

This text of 2001 Ohio 1327 (In re Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Walker, 2001 Ohio 1327, 93 Ohio St. 3d 211 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 211.]

IN RE WALKER. [Cite as In re Walker, 2001-Ohio-1327.] Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration of In re Anderson. (No. 01-445—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. __________________ {¶ 1} The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment denying a discretionary appeal in In re Walker (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1536, 747 N.E.2d 833, is granted. {¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Boychan, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 93 Ohio St.3d 211.]

IN RE WALKER. [Cite as In re Walker, 2001-Ohio-1327.] Motion for reconsideration granted—Discretionary appeal allowed—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for consideration of In re Anderson. (No. 01-445—Submitted July 17, 2001—Decided September 19, 2001.) ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. __________________ {¶ 1} The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment denying a discretionary appeal in In re Walker (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1536, 747 N.E.2d 833, is granted. {¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is allowed. {¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. COOK, J., dissents. __________________ David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Boychan, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1327, 93 Ohio St. 3d 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-walker-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack