In re Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Walker

754 N.E.2d 254, 93 Ohio St. 3d 211

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 19, 2001·No. No. 01-445·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment denying a discretionary appeal in In re Walker (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1536, 747 N.E.2d 833, is granted.

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67.

David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Boychan, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The motion for this court to reconsider its judgment denying a discretionary appeal in In re Walker (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 1536, 747 N.E.2d 833, is granted.

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded for consideration of In re Anderson (2001), 92 Ohio St.3d 63, 748 N.E.2d 67.

David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Felice Harris, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Michael K. Allen, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Thomas J. Boychan, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents.

In re Walker, 754 N.E.2d 254, 93 Ohio St. 3d 211 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

754 N.E.2d 254 (In re Walker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related