In re Tresin J.

202 A.3d 1022, 331 Conn. 909
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 13, 2019·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the respondent father for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 187 Conn.App. 804, ___ A.3d ___, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court, which terminated the respondent father's parental rights based on the absence of an ongoing parent child relationship, was not required to apply the infancy exception recognized in In re Carla C., 167 Conn.App. 248, 143 A.3d 677 (2016)?"

D'AURIA and MULLINS, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Tresin J., 202 A.3d 1022, 331 Conn. 909 (Colo. 2019).

202 A.3d 1022 (In re Tresin J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Tresin J.
334 Conn. 314 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)