in Re: Tracy Nixon

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 15, 2022·No. 05-22-00795-CV·Published

Opinion

DENY and Opinion Filed August 15, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00795-CV

IN RE TRACY NIXON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Nowell

Relator’s August 11, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the

administrative law judge’s denial of permission for relator, having previously been

identified as a vexatious litigant, to file a petition in the trial court. Relator also filed

a motion asking this Court to obtain records from the clerk’s office pertaining to her

claim.

Based on our review of the petition, attached document, and motion, we

conclude that relator has failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

52 in numerous ways. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52. For example, relator failed to provide

a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a). Relator’s motion acknowledges that she is able

to obtain copies of the relevant documents herself.

Because relator has failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

52 and has failed to provide an adequate record for our review, we deny the petition.

See In re Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 759 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding).

We likewise deny relator’s motion.

220795f.p05 /s/ Erin A. Nowell ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Tracy Nixon, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

in Re: Tracy Nixon (in Re: Tracy Nixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Butler
270 S.W.3d 757 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)