in Re: Tracy Nixon
This text of in Re: Tracy Nixon (in Re: Tracy Nixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed March 3, 2021
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00096-CV
IN RE TRACY NIXON, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-09145
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Nowell In his February 9, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges the
trial court’s partial summary judgment order dismissing claims against the insurance
company. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court
clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).
After reviewing the petition and record, we conclude that the petition is
deficient, see TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 and 52.7, and that, in any event, relator has an
adequate appellate remedy, see In re Brown, No. 05-19-00877-CV, 2019 WL 3334622, *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 25, 2019) (mem. op.) (establishing that
adequate appellate remedy exists for challenge to grant of partial summary
judgment). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
/Erin A. Nowell/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
210096F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Tracy Nixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tracy-nixon-texapp-2021.