In Re Tracey Service Co., Inc.

17 B.R. 405, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4836, 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 948
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 11, 1982
Docket19-10130
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 17 B.R. 405 (In Re Tracey Service Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Tracey Service Co., Inc., 17 B.R. 405, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4836, 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 948 (Pa. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION

WILLIAM A. KING, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

This case reaches the Court on a motion by a judgment creditor to convert the case under Chapter 11 to a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code; or, in the alternative, to appoint a Trustee in the Chapter 11 case. The Court finds that sufficient cause exists for the case to be converted to Chapter 7. An Order will be entered converting the case and appointing an Interim Trustee pursuant to § 701. 1

*407 The factual background of this case is somewhat involved. An involuntary petition under Chapter 7 of the Code was filed on July 13, 1981. 2 One of the petitioning creditors was Acar Supply Co., which has filed the instant motion. On August 3, 1981, the debtor filed a praecipe to convert the case to Chapter 11 pursuant to § 706(a).

The Schedules and Statement of Affairs of the debtor should have been filed within fifteen (15) days of the conversion. 3 Several applications for extensions of time to file these documents were granted. The final extension required these documents to be filed by October 2, 1981. Said documents were not filed until October 26, 1981.

Acar Supply Co. had, meanwhile, filed a motion on September 16, 1981, to convert the case to Chapter 7 or for the appointment of a Trustee. A hearing on the motion was scheduled for October 22,1981, and continued to October 27, 1981. On that date, testimony was taken in part, and the hearing was continued to November 23, 1981. Upon completion of testimony at the continued hearing, counsel for the debtor and Acar were directed by the Court to file proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and memoranda of law.

The debtor-in-possession in a Chapter 11 case is required to file monthly operating statements. 4 In this case, the statements for August, September and October were not filed until November 23, 1981, although they have been filed regularly since that time.

A plan of reorganization and a disclosure statement have yet to be filed by the debt- or-in-possession. It has been over five (5) months since the case was converted and the exclusive period, provided by the Code, for the debtor to file a plan of reorganization has expired. 5

The motion filed by Acar asserts several grounds in support of the motion. There are four (4) bases under which conversion is sought. 6 First, it is averred that the debtor is not an extant, viable business concern. Acar alleges that the debtor has already been dissolved and liquidated by a forced sale of most of the debtor’s assets, instigated by the major secured creditors of the corporation. Second, it is alleged that the debtor will be unable to propose and effectuate a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11. Third, the movant alleges that there is a continuing loss to the debtor’s estate. Fourth, it is alleged that there was no likelihood of rehabilitation. Therefore, Acar asserts that the case should be converted to Chapter 7 pursuant to § 1112(b) of. the Bankruptcy Code.

Acar has also asserted that a trustee should be appointed in the Chapter 11 case, if the case is not converted. It is alleged that current management of the debtor was incompetent and had grossly mismanaged the affairs of the debtor in prior years. The Court will order the case to be converted to Chapter 7, therefore, it will not be necessary to approach this issue.

The debtor denied all the above allegations raised by Acar. It is asserted that an operating subsidiary of the debtor is conducting business at a profit. Furthermore, there are other assets of the debtor which can be used in formulating a Chapter 11 plan. The debtor maintains that it could be reorganized as a holding company which could be profitably operated to finance a repayment plan.

*408 Hearing on this motion was conducted on two (2) different days. Acar called several witnesses, including an officer of the major secured creditor, a former employee of the debtor corporation and the chief executive officer of the debtor. 7 Furthermore, a large number of documents were introduced into evidence.

The debtor has not been engaged in active operation since early 1980. At one time, the debtor had twenty-five (25) employees, however, only the chief executive officer is presently involved in the company’s affairs. The debtor’s inventory has been disposed of at public auction. Furthermore, nearly all of the machinery and equipment have also been sold. The premises used in the operation of the debtor’s business was sold at sheriff’s sale. Three (3) other parcels of real estate were also sold. The funds realized by these sales were applied against the debts owed to the major secured creditors.

Financially, the debtor seems to be in disastrous shape. The debtor is not generating any current income. None of the debtor’s accounts receivable are due subsequent to December 81, 1980. Apparently, there remains a substantial amount of receivables awaiting collection efforts. 8 The debtor’s balance sheet for 1979 showed a negative net worth. No more recent statement was introduced. All records of the debtor were lost when various property was sold at a distress sale. Finally, Continental Bank is the major secured creditor, with approximately a $500,000 obligation, on which interest continues to accrue. 9

Several assets of the debtor have yet to be liquidated. There is accounts receivable of approximately $50,000 awaiting collection efforts. There are between eight and ten trucks encumbered by Continental Bank; pursuant to relief sought in adversary proceeding No. 81-1305K, these vehicles will be repossessed by the secured creditor. The debtor corporation also holds title to the residence of the chief executive officer of the company. It is alleged that efforts are being made to sell the property for between $450,000 and $500,000. This asset is not owned free and clear. Furthermore, the president is very unclear as to which creditors are secured in the premises and for what amounts. The only other asset owned by the debtor is stock in an operating subsidiary corporation, Tracy Mechanical, Inc. The debtor holds 80% of the stock in this entity; the stock, however, is in possession of the United States Marshal for this District, and is the subject of litigation in the United States District Court. Also, it is alleged that the stock is pledged to Continental Bank, the major secured creditor in this case.

Originally, the debtor was involved in the installation of heating and air conditioning units in residential housing. The debtor has not been engaged in this business since early 1980. A former employee of the debt- or has started his own company and is involved in servicing many of the debtor’s former customers. The debtor corporation presently has no premises, no inventory, no equipment, no employees, no office, and no business phone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Grasso
497 B.R. 448 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2013)
In Re Austin Ocala Ltd.
150 B.R. 279 (M.D. Florida, 1993)
In Re East Coast Airways, Ltd.
146 B.R. 325 (E.D. New York, 1992)
In Re Great American Pyramid Joint Venture
144 B.R. 780 (W.D. Tennessee, 1992)
In Re Sal Caruso Cheese, Inc.
107 B.R. 808 (N.D. New York, 1989)
In Re Smith
77 B.R. 496 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1987)
In Re D & F Meat Corp.
68 B.R. 39 (S.D. New York, 1986)
In Re Sheehan
58 B.R. 296 (D. South Dakota, 1986)
In Re Greene
57 B.R. 272 (S.D. New York, 1986)
In Re McDermott
78 B.R. 646 (N.D. New York, 1985)
Matter of Denrose Diamond
49 B.R. 754 (S.D. New York, 1985)
In Re Photo Promotion Associates, Inc.
47 B.R. 454 (S.D. New York, 1985)
In Re Economy Cab & Tool Co., Inc.
44 B.R. 721 (D. Minnesota, 1984)
In Re All American of Ashburn, Inc.
40 B.R. 104 (N.D. Georgia, 1984)
In Re Telemark Management Co., Inc.
41 B.R. 501 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1984)
In Re Route 202 Corp.
37 B.R. 367 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1984)
In re Frost
37 B.R. 49 (M.D. Tennessee, 1984)
In Re 312 West 91st Street Co., Inc.
35 B.R. 346 (S.D. New York, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 B.R. 405, 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4836, 8 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tracey-service-co-inc-paeb-1982.