In re Townsend
This text of 186 B.R. 248 (In re Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on the confirmation of Debtors, Emma and Freddie Townsend’s, First Amended Chapter 13 Plan. At the confirmation hearing, attorney for the Chapter 13 Trustee, Diana Daugherty, objected to confirmation because under the amended plan, the proposed payments will not pay in enough funds to pay off home mortgage arrears within the 24 months stated in the plan.1 Amended Plan at ¶ 2. Indeed the amended plan proposes to pay the Debtors’ attorney ahead of and to the exclusion the home mortgage arrearage.
[249]*249This Court finds that the First-Amended Plan is inconsistent with the spirit of § 1322(b)(5). The relevant language of § 1322(b)(5) reads: “the plan may ... provide for the curing of any default within a reasonable time ...” § 1322(b)(5). The opportunity to cure a default is a shield by which a debtor can heal a delinquent debt. It is not a sword which the debtor can use to further delay payment while the attorney collects a fee.2 Curing of any default within a reasonable time means payments in equal monthly installments over the first 24 (now 30) months after the filing of the plan. Payment of attorney fees cannot usurp the obligation to provide equal monthly payments beginning with the first disbursement under the plan. It is therefore
ORDERED that Confirmation of Debtor’s First Amended Chapter 13 Plan is DENIED; it is further
ORDERED that Debtor has 20 days to file an amended plan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 B.R. 248, 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2293, 1994 WL 848633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-townsend-moeb-1994.