in Re Todd Warren Altschul
This text of in Re Todd Warren Altschul (in Re Todd Warren Altschul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00007-CV
IN RE TODD WARREN ALTSCHUL
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Todd Warren Altschul’s petition for writ of mandamus was filed in January of
2011. In the petition, Altschul complained that the trial court had not timely ruled on
Altschul’s pending petition for writ of injunction. Altschul now requests that his
petition for writ of mandamus be dismissed because the trial court has recently ruled on
Altschul’s petition for writ of injunction.
This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).
Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the
time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.
P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R.
APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (West 2005); and § 51.208 (West Supp. 2010). Under these circumstances, we
suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX.
R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable of the Court in no
way eliminates or reduces the fees owed.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed April 6, 2011 [OT06]
In re Altschul Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Todd Warren Altschul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-todd-warren-altschul-texapp-2011.