in Re Todd-Warren Altschul

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 15, 2010·No. 01-09-00389-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 15, 2010






In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________


NOS. 01-09-00388-CR

          01-09-00389-CR


IN RE TODD-WARREN ALTSCHUL , Relator





Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus




MEMORANDUM OPINION

          Relator, Todd-Warren Altschul, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had not ruled on his motions for judgments nunc pro tunc that he filed in cause numbers 26672 and 26673. Since the petition was filed, the trial court has ruled on relator’s motions.

          We, therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See In re Jaramillo, 164 S.W.3d 417 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Woods, 261 S.W.3d 340, 341 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding); See In re Newby, 266 S.W.3d 557, 559 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding); In re Markowitz, 998 S.W.2d 417 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding).

          We deny as moot any pending motions.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley and Sharp.

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Todd-Warren Altschul, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re Todd-Warren Altschul (in Re Todd-Warren Altschul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haggar Clothing Co. v. Hernandez
164 S.W.3d 407 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
In Re Markowitz
998 S.W.2d 417 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
In Re Woods
261 S.W.3d 340 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
In Re Newby
266 S.W.3d 557 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)