in Re Todd-Warren Altschul
This text of in Re Todd-Warren Altschul (in Re Todd-Warren Altschul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 15, 2010
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NOS. 01-09-00388-CR
01-09-00389-CR
IN RE TODD-WARREN ALTSCHUL , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Todd-Warren Altschul, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court had not ruled on his motions for judgments nunc pro tunc that he filed in cause numbers 26672 and 26673. Since the petition was filed, the trial court has ruled on relator’s motions.
We, therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See In re Jaramillo, 164 S.W.3d 417 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Woods, 261 S.W.3d 340, 341 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding); See In re Newby, 266 S.W.3d 557, 559 (Tex. App.—Waco 2008, orig. proceeding); In re Markowitz, 998 S.W.2d 417 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, orig. proceeding).
We deny as moot any pending motions.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley and Sharp.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Todd-Warren Altschul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-todd-warren-altschul-texapp-2010.