In re Tishauna Patricia N.
This text of 68 A.D.3d 1119 (In re Tishauna Patricia N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The mother’s appeal from the order denying her motion to reinstate visitation with the subject children has been rendered academic in light of a subsequent order of the Family Court reinstating her visitation with the subject children and, [1120]*1120therefore, must be dismissed (see Pollack v Pollack, 56 AD3d 637, 637-638 [2008]; Matter of Damian M., 41 AD3d 600 [2007]; People ex rel A.E.F. v K.T.L., 40 AD3d 894, 895 [2007]).
The mother’s contention that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in approving a permanency goal of placement for adoption for the subject children is not properly before this Court because that issue was not determined in the order appealed from. Dillon, J.E, Santucci, Florio and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 1119, 890 N.Y.2d 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-tishauna-patricia-n-nyappdiv-2009.