In re Joseph A.

78 A.D.3d 826, 910 N.Y.S.2d 657
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 9, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 78 A.D.3d 826 (In re Joseph A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Joseph A., 78 A.D.3d 826, 910 N.Y.S.2d 657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

—In two related child neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Brandes, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated December 18, 2009, which, in effect, denied her application to modify a prior visitation order dated October 2, 2009, so as to direct that visitation takes place in Staten Island.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The visitation order that is the subject of this appeal has been superseded by a subsequent visitation order dated May 27, 2010, from which no appeal has been taken. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as academic (see Matter of Aniyah Mc. [Ann Marie Mc.], 69 AD3d 729, 730 [2010]; Matter of Tishauna Patricia N. [Tee Tee Ann W.], 68 AD3d 1119, 1119-1120 [2009]; Matter of Damian M., 41 AD3d 600 [2007]; Matter of Jahkayia M., [827]*82748 AD3d 393, 394 [2008]; Matter of Briggs v Porter, 284 AD2d 455, 456 [2001]; see also Bubbins v Bubbins, 114 AD2d 346, 346 [1985]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are not properly before this Court, as they raise issues not determined by the order appealed from (see Matter of Tishauna Patricia N. [Tee Tee Ann W.], 68 AD3d at 1119-1120; see generally Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, 39 AD3d 624, 626 [2007]; Grossman v Amalgamated Warbasse Houses, Inc., 21 AD3d 448 [2005]). Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Fowler v. Rivera
134 A.D.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Jaiden S. (Lourdes G.)
119 A.D.3d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Saldivar v. Cabrera
109 A.D.3d 831 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Tara C.
106 A.D.3d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Padin v. Padin
103 A.D.3d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re Michael F.
100 A.D.3d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Anthony B.-A.
88 A.D.3d 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
THILLMAN, LORI M. v. MAYER, CHARLES R.
85 A.D.3d 1624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.3d 826, 910 N.Y.S.2d 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-joseph-a-nyappdiv-2010.