In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.

89 A.D.3d 542, 933 N.Y.2d 12

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 2011

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 89 A.D.3d 542 (In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M., 89 A.D.3d 542, 933 N.Y.2d 12 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

The finding that the mother suffered from mental illness was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [a]). The court-appointed psychologist conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the mother and determined that the mother’s mental illness, and her reluctance to take medication for her condition, rendered her incapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Roberto A. [Altagracia A.], 73 AD3d 501 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 703 [2010]; Matter of Victoria Lauren W., 15 AD3d 165 [2005]).

Clear and convincing evidence, including the psychologist’s testimony, also demonstrated that the father is unable, at present and for the foreseeable future, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject child by reason of his mental retardation, which originated during his developmental period (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [b]; Matter of Jasmine Pauline M., 62 AD3d 483 [2009]).

We have considered respondents’ remaining contentions and [543]*543find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, De-Grasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The finding that the mother suffered from mental illness was supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [a]). The court-appointed psychologist conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the mother and determined that the mother’s mental illness, and her reluctance to take medication for her condition, rendered her incapable of caring for the child presently and for the foreseeable future (see Matter of Roberto A. [Altagracia A.], 73 AD3d 501 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 703 [2010]; Matter of Victoria Lauren W., 15 AD3d 165 [2005]).

Clear and convincing evidence, including the psychologist’s testimony, also demonstrated that the father is unable, at present and for the foreseeable future, to provide proper and adequate care for the subject child by reason of his mental retardation, which originated during his developmental period (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [b]; Matter of Jasmine Pauline M., 62 AD3d 483 [2009]).

We have considered respondents’ remaining contentions and [543]*543find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, De-Grasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 A.D.3d 542, 933 N.Y.2d 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-timothy-reynaldo-lm-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack