In re Jasmine Pauline M.

62 A.D.3d 483, 879 N.Y.S.2d 407
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 12, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 483 (In re Jasmine Pauline M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jasmine Pauline M., 62 A.D.3d 483, 879 N.Y.S.2d 407 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Sara E Schechter, J.), entered on or about March 14, 2008, which terminated respondent mother’s parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commis[484]*484sioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence, including expert testimony from the psychologist who examined respondent and reviewed all her available medical records, supported the determination that she is presently and for the foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for her children (Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]) by reason of mental illness (subd [6] [a]) or mental retardation (subd [6] [b]). The evidence showed that even though respondent’s adaptive skills had improved, they were not enough to ensure the safety of her child while in her care (Matter of Leomia Louise C., 41 AD3d 249 [2007]).

Termination of respondent’s parental rights was proper inasmuch as adoption represents the child’s only prospect of a permanent, stable and nurturing familial disposition (Matter of Nadaniel Jackie P., 35 AD3d 305 [2006]). The court was not required to issue an order directing posttermination visitation between respondent and her child (Matter of April S., 307 AD2d 204 [2003], lv denied 1 NY3d 504 [2003]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of K.Y.Z. (W.Z.)
2024 NY Slip Op 03458 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
In re Kasey D.
100 A.D.3d 417 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
In re Timothy Reynaldo L.M.
89 A.D.3d 542 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Tyrique Alexandra B.
87 A.D.3d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
In re Prince McM.
77 A.D.3d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re Imani W.
26 Misc. 3d 792 (New York Family Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 A.D.3d 483, 879 N.Y.S.2d 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jasmine-pauline-m-nyappdiv-2009.