In Re: Timothy Lee Nolan
This text of In Re: Timothy Lee Nolan (In Re: Timothy Lee Nolan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TO BE PUBLISHED
Supreme Court of Kentucky 2025-SC-0103-KB
IN RE: TIMOTHY LEE NOLAN
IN SUPREME COURT
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Timothy Lee Nolan’s Motion to
Resign under Terms of Permanent Disbarment made pursuant to Kentucky
Supreme Court Rules (SCR) 3.480(3). Nolan’s Kentucky Bar Association (KBA)
Member Number is 51990 and his bar roster address is listed as 12786 Burns
Road, California, Kentucky 41007. Nolan was admitted to practice law in the
Commonwealth in 1973. Nolan is currently incarcerated at Northpoint Training
Center, P.O. Box 479, Burgin, Kentucky 40310.
The KBA has filed a response to Nolan’s motion expressing no objection
and requesting that an order be entered sustaining his motion. Having
reviewed the record and the underlying facts, we grant Nolan’s motion for
permanent disbarment.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 2017, Nolan was indicted in Campbell County on a multitude of felony
counts, most of which involved allegations of a sexual nature. The victims of
some of the counts against Nolan were minors. Following negotiations with the
prosecution, on March 8, 2019, Nolan entered guilty pleas to twenty-one counts, reserving the right to challenge the constitutionality of Kentucky
Revised Statute (KRS) 529.100, the human trafficking statute, which was the
basis for some of the charges. The KBA had previously opened disciplinary
proceedings against Nolan in Office of Bar Counsel (OBC) File 17-DIS-0133 and
on May 24, 2018, Nolan was temporarily suspended from the practice of law
pursuant to Supreme Court Rules (SCR) 3.166(1).
The twenty-one counts Nolan pled guilty to were comprised of: (a) four
felony counts of Promoting Human Trafficking of a Minor—Commercial Sexual
Activity; (b) one felony count of Unlawful Transaction with a Minor—Controlled
Substance (pursuant to North Carolina v Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970)); (c) one
felony count of Unlawful Transaction with a Minor Under 18—Controlled
Substance; (d) eight misdemeanor counts of Criminal Attempt Human
Trafficking of an Adult—Commercial Sexual Activity (one pursuant to North
Carolina v Alford); (e) three felony counts of Human Trafficking—Commercial
Sexual Activity; (f) one felony count of Unlawful Transaction with a Minor
Under 16, Controlled Substance; (g) one felony count of Criminal Attempt
Human Trafficking of a Minor—Commercial Sexual Activity (pursuant to North
Carolina v Alford); (h) one misdemeanor count of Unlawful Transaction with at
Minor, 3rd degree; and (i) one misdemeanor count of Prostitution.
Nolan’s convictions were affirmed by the Court of Appeals in the
unpublished decision in Nolan v. Commonwealth, 2022-CA-0232-MR, 2023 WL
3027861, at *1 (Ky. App. Apr. 21, 2023), which upheld the constitutionality of
KRS 529.100. This Court denied Nolan’s motion for discretionary review on
2 August 16, 2023. Nolan acknowledges in his motion “that he has exhausted all
avenues for appellate relief at the state level.”
Nolan is presently serving a total of twenty years in prison with additional
five years conditional discharge upon expiration of his sentence. He was also
ordered to pay a $10,000 Human Trafficking Victims Services Fee and reimburse
$7,000 to Public Advocacy for his representation.
Nolan’s crimes constitute violations of SCR 3.130(8.4)(b) which states it
is professional misconduct for a lawyer to “commit a criminal act that reflects
adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in
other respects.”
In his motion for permanent disbarment, Nolan acknowledges that the
conduct to which he pled guilty is sufficient to warrant permanent disbarment
and that he desires to terminate all pending disciplinary proceedings by
resigning under terms of permanent disbarment. Nolan also affirms his
understanding that “he cannot be reinstated to practice from permanent
disbarment, and the provisions of SCR 3.510 do not apply.” He also asserts
that upon entry of such an order, “he will never again engage in the practice of
law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.”
II. ANALYSIS
SCR 3.480(3) allows for Nolan’s motion such that he may conclude all
disciplinary actions pending against him by “withdraw[ing] his membership
under terms of permanent disbarment.”
3 In disciplinary proceedings, a criminal conviction “forecloses further
inquiry into the issue of respondent’s guilt or innocence of the [criminal]
offense.” KBA v. Lester, 437 S.W.2d 958, 959 (Ky. 1968). There can be no
debate that the abusive, sexual, drug-related, conduct—involving minors—to
which Nolan pled guilty, supports permanent disbarment. The conduct, and
totality of such conduct, is so sufficiently severe that nothing less than
permanent disbarment is appropriate here.
III. DISCIPLINE
Based on his convictions and his admissions of ethical violations, we
agree that Nolan’s motion to resign under terms of permanent disbarment is
warranted and appropriate pursuant to SCR 3.480(3) and, therefore, the Court
sustains his Motion to Resign under Terms of Permanent Disbarment and
ORDERS:
1. Timothy Lee Nolan, KBA Member No. 51990, is hereby permanently
disbarred from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky;
2. Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Nolan shall, within ten (10) days from the
entry of this Opinion and Order, notify all clients, in writing, of his inability to
represent them; notify, in writing, all courts in which he has matters pending
of his disbarment from the practice of law; and furnish copies of all letters of
notice to the Office of Bar Counsel. Furthermore, to the extent possible, Nolan
shall immediately cancel and cease any advertising activities in which he is
engaged; and
4 3. In accordance with SCR 3.450, Nolan shall pay all costs certified by
the KBA in these proceedings, said sum being $121.05, for which execution
may issue from this Court upon finality of this Opinion and Order.
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED: April 24, 2024
____________________________________ CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Timothy Lee Nolan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-timothy-lee-nolan-ky-2025.