In re Tillerson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In re Tillerson

821 A.2d 584

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 29, 2003·No. No. 816 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on February 28, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing George E. Tillerson, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; George E. Tillerson, III, is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the [585]*585Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2003, a Rule having been entered by this Court on February 28, 2003, pursuant to Rule 214(d)(1), Pa.R.D.E., directing George E. Tillerson, III, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension and no response having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; George E. Tillerson, III, is placed on temporary suspension and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.; and the matter is referred to the [585]*585Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 214(f)(1), Pa.R.D.E.

In re Tillerson, 821 A.2d 584 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

821 A.2d 584 (In re Tillerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.