In re Ticho

260 A.D. 675, 23 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4691

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On November 1, 1940, in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, the respondent pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, he must, therefore, be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ticho, 260 A.D. 675, 23 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

260 A.D. 675 (In re Ticho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.