In re Ticho
This text of 260 A.D. 675 (In re Ticho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On November 1, 1940, in the Court of General Sessions of the County of New York, the respondent pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the second degree. Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, he must, therefore, be disbarred.
Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 675, 23 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ticho-nyappdiv-1940.