In re Ticho

257 A.D. 622, 14 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7827

This text of 257 A.D. 622 (In re Ticho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ticho, 257 A.D. 622, 14 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent is censured for so negligently conducting the affairs of his office that funds collected for a client [623]*623were commingled with his own and not remitted until after the matter had been called to his attention by the petitioner’s grievance committee.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 A.D. 622, 14 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ticho-nyappdiv-1939.