In re Ticho

257 A.D. 622, 14 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7827

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent is censured for so negligently conducting the affairs of his office that funds collected for a client [623]*623were commingled with his own and not remitted until after the matter had been called to his attention by the petitioner’s grievance committee.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ticho, 257 A.D. 622, 14 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 622 (In re Ticho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.