in Re: Theresa Barnett

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 2, 2013·No. 05-13-00775-CV·Published

Opinion

Deny Writ and Opinion Filed July 2, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-00775-CV

IN RE THERESA BARNETT, Relator

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC10-00136

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator contends the trial judge erred in making a number of pretrial rulings related to

discovery, continuances of the trial, and motions for summary judgment and to dismiss. The

facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the

record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.

proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, motion for

emergency relief, and motion for extension of time to file response and amended writ. We

further DENY real parties in interest’s motion for sanctions.

DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Theresa Barnett, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

in Re: Theresa Barnett (in Re: Theresa Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)