in Re: Theresa Barnett
This text of in Re: Theresa Barnett (in Re: Theresa Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed July 2, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00775-CV
IN RE THERESA BARNETT, Relator
On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC10-00136
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator contends the trial judge erred in making a number of pretrial rulings related to
discovery, continuances of the trial, and motions for summary judgment and to dismiss. The
facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the
record before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig.
proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, motion for
emergency relief, and motion for extension of time to file response and amended writ. We
further DENY real parties in interest’s motion for sanctions.
DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Theresa Barnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-theresa-barnett-texapp-2013.