In re the Twenty-fourth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury

895 A.2d 518, 586 Pa. 465, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 310
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 8, 2006·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Notice of Appeal filed at the above docket and the associated Petition for Review and Emergency Application for Stay Pending Appeal, it is hereby ORDERED that the Notice of Appeal is QUASHED and the Petition for Review is DENIED, as the challenged orders are interlocutory and not subject to interlocutory appellate review. Further, the temporary stay issued by this Court is DISSOLVED.

Justice SAYLOR files a concurring statement in this matter. Justice EAKIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Twenty-fourth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, 895 A.2d 518, 586 Pa. 465, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 310 (Pa. 2006).

895 A.2d 518 (In re the Twenty-fourth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Dauphin County Fourth Investigating Grand Jury
943 A.2d 929 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
In Re the Twenty-Fourth Statewide Investigating Grand Jury
907 A.2d 505 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2006)