In Re the Trust of Spatt

298 N.E.2d 121, 32 N.Y.2d 778, 344 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1313
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 2, 1973·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Memorandum.

This court traditionally has exercised a very limited jurisdiction on review of allowances for legal services. To enable us to exercise even that jurisdiction requires that the record include not only a sufficient description of the services rendered but also sufficient evidence as to the value of such services. Accordingly we remand this case to Supreme Court, Kings County, for the introduction of appropriate evidence as to the value of the services for which compensation is sought and a determination de novo of the amount to be allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Trust of Spatt, 298 N.E.2d 121, 32 N.Y.2d 778, 344 N.Y.S.2d 959, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1313 (N.Y. 1973).

298 N.E.2d 121 (In Re the Trust of Spatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Bade
338 N.E.2d 614 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
In Re the Trust of Spatt
298 N.E.2d 121 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)