In Re the Trust of Spatt
Opinions
This court traditionally has exercised a very limited jurisdiction on review of allowances for legal services. To enable us to exercise even that jurisdiction requires that the record include not only a sufficient description of the services rendered but also sufficient evidence as to the value of such services. Accordingly we remand this case to Supreme Court, Kings County, for the introduction of appropriate evidence as to the value of the services for which compensation is sought and a determination de novo of the amount to be allowed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
298 N.E.2d 121 (In Re the Trust of Spatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.