In re the Trust for the Benefit of Duke

702 A.2d 1007, 305 N.J. Super. 407, 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 374
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided April 16, 1997·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Chandi Duke Heffner, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claim to be declared a “lineal descendant” of Doris Duke, and therefore the current beneficiary of Doris Duke’s share of a trust established in 1924 by her father, the late James B. Duke. Heffner also appeals from certain ancillary orders relating to the Trustees and their counsel.

[408]*408After considering the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel, we affirm both the summary judgment and the orders relating to the Trustees and their counsel entered in the Law Division substantially for the reasons stated in the comprehensive opinion of Judge Katherine R. DuPuis dated July 13, 1995, reported at 305 N.J.Super. 408, 702 A.2d 1008 (Ch.1995). Given the novelty of the issue before us, the entry of judgment on appeal shall be without costs, and with each party bearing its own legal fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Trust for the Benefit of Duke, 702 A.2d 1007, 305 N.J. Super. 407, 1997 N.J. Super. LEXIS 374 (N.J. Ct. App. 1997).

702 A.2d 1007 (In re the Trust for the Benefit of Duke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In the Matter of Thomas R. Tomei Trust
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
Steiger v. Steiger CA4/1
California Court of Appeal, 2016
In re E.M.M.
25 Pa. D. & C.5th 107 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 2011)
In Re Trust Under Agreement of Vander Poel
933 A.2d 628 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2007)
In Re Trust Agreement Dec. 20, 1961
944 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
In re the Estate of Fenton
901 A.2d 455 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)