In re the Receipt of Fee by Smith
This text of 3 Vet. App. 77 (In re the Receipt of Fee by Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
On November 11, 1991, petitioner, William G. Smith, Esq., filed a motion for appropriate relief. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary), in tura, filed a response. Petitioner then filed motions for augmented sanctions, for other appropriate relief, for oral argument, and for en banc hearing. The Secretary filed a response, [78]*78pursuant to U.S.Vet.App.R. 21(c), on June 12, 1992.
On consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED, by the panel (denoted by *), that petitioner’s motion for appropriate relief, for augmented sanctions, for other appropriate relief and for oral argument are denied since petitioner incurred no cognizable injury. It is further
ORDERED, by the full court, that petitioner’s motion for en banc hearing is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Vet. App. 77, 1992 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 248, 1992 WL 191133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-receipt-of-fee-by-smith-cavc-1992.