In re the Receipt of Fee by Smith

3 Vet. App. 77, 1992 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 248, 1992 WL 191133
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided August 6, 1992·No. No. 91-2041·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On November 11, 1991, petitioner, William G. Smith, Esq., filed a motion for appropriate relief. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary), in tura, filed a response. Petitioner then filed motions for augmented sanctions, for other appropriate relief, for oral argument, and for en banc hearing. The Secretary filed a response, [78]*78pursuant to U.S.Vet.App.R. 21(c), on June 12, 1992.

On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the panel (denoted by *), that petitioner’s motion for appropriate relief, for augmented sanctions, for other appropriate relief and for oral argument are denied since petitioner incurred no cognizable injury. It is further

ORDERED, by the full court, that petitioner’s motion for en banc hearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Receipt of Fee by Smith, 3 Vet. App. 77, 1992 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 248, 1992 WL 191133 (Cal. 1992).

3 Vet. App. 77 (In re the Receipt of Fee by Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Fee Agreement of Smith
4 Vet. App. 487 (Veterans Claims, 1993)