In re the Readjustment, etc., Westchester Title & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Readjustment, etc., Westchester Title & Trust Co.

260 A.D. 1054, 24 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6021

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 1054 (In re the Readjustment, etc., Westchester Title & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Readjustment, etc., Westchester Title & Trust Co., 260 A.D. 1054, 24 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of an official referee, to whom the proceedings were referred, on consent, to hear and determine, denying a motion of certain certificate holders to strike from the order in each proceeding the allowance of ten dollars costs to the attorneys making application for allowances, dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable for the reasons stated in Matter of Westchester Title and Trust Co. (post, p. 1055) decided herewith. We have, however, examined the merits so far as is possible on this record and have concluded that the order was proper. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of an official referee, to whom the proceedings were referred, on consent, to hear and determine, denying a motion of certain certificate holders to strike from the order in each proceeding the allowance of ten dollars costs to the attorneys making application for allowances, dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable for the reasons stated in Matter of Westchester Title and Trust Co. (post, p. 1055) decided herewith. We have, however, examined the merits so far as is possible on this record and have concluded that the order was proper. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 1054, 24 N.Y.S.2d 380, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-readjustment-etc-westchester-title-trust-co-nyappdiv-1940.