In re: The Prosecutor

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 3, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00455·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Petitioner, 25 CIVIL 0455 (JHR) (SDA) -against- JUDGMENT THE PROSECUTOR, Respondent. wn eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 31, 2025, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, grants Respondent’s motion to dismiss the Petition. The Court will not issue a certificate of appealability because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Matthews v. United States, 682 F.3d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 2012). Moreover, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that “any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is thus denied” for the purpose of an appeal; accordingly, the petition is dismissed and the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York November 3, 2025

TAMMI M. HELLWIG ClerkofCourt

BY: Nae-Dull Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: The Prosecutor, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

In re: The Prosecutor (In re: The Prosecutor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matthews v. United States
682 F.3d 180 (Second Circuit, 2012)