In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Wiltsie

186 P. 848, 109 Wash. 261, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 973
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 3, 1920
DocketNo. 121
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 186 P. 848 (In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Wiltsie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of Wiltsie, 186 P. 848, 109 Wash. 261, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 973 (Wash. 1920).

Opinion

Mackintosh, J.

The state board of law examiners, upon testimony taken in this matter, recommended tbe disbarment of A. B. Wiltsie for unprofessional conduct in tbe preparation of questionnaires and claims of exemption under tbe selective service act. Without reviewing tbe testimony in detail, it is enough to say that it shows Wiltsie solicited tbe employment of claiming exemptions for persons subject to tbe operation of tbe selective service act, and suggested, encouraged and assisted in the preparation of false affidavits looking to tbe improper exemption of bis clients.

Tbe board also found, as one of tbe grounds for bis disbarment, that tbe charges made for these services were excessive. We do not feel like depriving a practitioner of bis right to continue bis profession on á question as debatable as tbe propriety of tbe amount of a fee. Such a question is so much a matter of in[262]*262dividual opinion that it should not he the basis' for disbarment except in the most aggravated and extreme case. So far as the record discloses, the fees were voluntarily paid, and were it the only charge here that such fees were excessive, the extreme penalty would not be' merited.

The charges of solicitation of business, however, and the filing of false claims of exemption are so well proved and so flagrantly unethical, as well as disloyal, as sufficiently to evidence that degree of moral turpitude unfitting the practitioner to continue the practice of law in this state. For that reason, the recommendation of the board is adopted, and an order is hereby made disbarring A. B. Wiltsie from the practice of law in the state of Washington.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Walman
374 A.2d 354 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1977)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Fraser
523 P.2d 921 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Greer
380 P.2d 482 (Washington Supreme Court, 1963)
United States v. Stringer
124 F. Supp. 705 (D. Alaska, 1954)
In Re Hallinan
272 P.2d 768 (California Supreme Court, 1954)
In Re Burrus
258 S.W.2d 625 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1953)
Rheb v. Bar Ass'n of Baltimore
46 A.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1946)
Herrscher v. State Bar
49 P.2d 832 (California Supreme Court, 1935)
In re Clifton
196 P. 670 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1921)
Margolis's Case
112 A. 478 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 P. 848, 109 Wash. 261, 1920 Wash. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-proceedings-for-the-disbarment-of-wiltsie-wash-1920.