In re the probate of the will of Romaine
170 A. 16, 115 N.J. Eq. 172, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 745
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the probate of the will of Romaine. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 N.J. Eq. 173 →
Opinion
The orders appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Pailón, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. 1/-77.
■ For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, -Teenchaed, Paeeee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehek, Peeseie, Van Buseiee, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the probate of the will of Romaine, 170 A. 16, 115 N.J. Eq. 172, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 745 (N.J. 1934).
170 A. 16 (In re the probate of the will of Romaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.