In re the probate of the will of Romaine

170 A. 16, 115 N.J. Eq. 173, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 746
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Ctjbiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fallon, and reported in 113 N. J. Eq. Jft7.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Tbenchaed, Passes, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the probate of the will of Romaine, 170 A. 16, 115 N.J. Eq. 173, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 746 (N.J. 1934).

170 A. 16 (In re the probate of the will of Romaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

536 Broad St. Corp. v. Valco Mortgage Co., Inc.
38 A.2d 903 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)