In re the Probate of the Will of Bennett

207 A.D. 388, 202 N.Y.S. 201, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 7, 1923·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam:

We think that the evidence presented no real issue of fact as to the publication of the will. (Matter of Burnham, 201 App. Div. 621; affd., 234 N. Y. 475.) Therefore, the surrogate properly directed a verdict.

Kelly, P. J., Manning and Young, JJ., concur; Kelby, J., dissents, and reads for modification; Kapper, J., concurs with Kelby, J., for modification, and for a new trial, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact as to the due execution of the will, but does not regard the constitutionality of section .457a of the Civil Practice Act as involved in such determination.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Probate of the Will of Bennett, 207 A.D. 388, 202 N.Y.S. 201, 1923 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).

207 A.D. 388 (In re the Probate of the Will of Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Pugliese
215 A.D. 717 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Pierdiluca v. Benedetto
210 A.D. 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)