In re the Probate of the Will of Bennett
Opinions
We think that the evidence presented no real issue of fact as to the publication of the will. (Matter of Burnham, 201 App. Div. 621; affd., 234 N. Y. 475.) Therefore, the surrogate properly directed a verdict.
Kelly, P. J., Manning and Young, JJ., concur; Kelby, J., dissents, and reads for modification; Kapper, J., concurs with Kelby, J., for modification, and for a new trial, upon the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact as to the due execution of the will, but does not regard the constitutionality of section .457a of the Civil Practice Act as involved in such determination.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
207 A.D. 388 (In re the Probate of the Will of Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.