In re Pugliese
This text of 215 A.D. 717 (In re Pugliese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county unanimously affirmed, with costs. The record presents a case where there is not a particle of evidence contradicting the testimony of the subscribing witnesses to the will, or the facts as testified to by each of them. There was no issue of fact for submission to the jury. Under these circumstances the learned surrogate was entirely correct in admitting the will to probate. (See Matter of Burnham, 201 App. Div. 621; affd., 234 N. Y. 475; Matter of Bennett, 207 App. Div. 388.) Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D. 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-pugliese-nyappdiv-1925.