In Re the President, Managers & Company of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.

69 N.Y. 209, 1877 N.Y. LEXIS 823
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 3, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 69 N.Y. 209 (In Re the President, Managers & Company of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the President, Managers & Company of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co., 69 N.Y. 209, 1877 N.Y. LEXIS 823 (N.Y. 1877).

Opinion

Allen, J.

The corporation appellant, owning and operating a railroad, with all the rights of a railroad corporation, seeks to acquire the title to lands in invitmn, by proceedings under the general laws of the State. This company is Avithiu the provisions of those laws, and, in these proceedings, is seeking to avail itself of them in the exercise of the delegated power of eminent domain. The original act authorizing the formation of railroad corporations (chap. 140 of the Luavs of 1850), creates a system complete in itself for the acquisition of lands for the purposes of railroads, and the appraisal of damages to the owners of lands taken, and by § 18, the determination and judgment of the Supreme Court, upon an appeal from the appraisers, is made final and conclusive, as that statute has been interpreted, and no appeal lies to this court.

This Avas decided in the Matter of the New York Central Railroad Company v. Marvin (1 Kern., 276), and has been followed in repeated decisions since that time, and Avas recently reaffirmed in The People v. Belts (55 N. Y., 600).

The rule has been adjudged too often, and acted upon too long, to permit it hoav to be questioned. The act, chap. 270, of the Laws of 1854, relied upon by the counsel for the appellant as abrogating the provision of the act of 1850, making the action of the Supreme Court final, in the matter of the appraisal of lands taken by railroad corporations, has no application. It only gives an appeal from the Special *212 to the General Term of the Court in which the proceeding is had. Moreover, it relates solely to special judicial proceedings, and was intended only to apply to the ordinary proceedings which were, under the general provisions of law, regulating the practice of courts of justice. It is in pari materia with, and substantially a part of the Code of Procedure, which it supplements. A general law will not, in the absence of a very evident intent, on the part of the Legislature, to do so, and which intent must appear by the terms of the act itself, abrogate or change the provisions of a special law passed for particular cases, constituting a class by themselves, for which the general laws of the State do not profess to provide. It was not in the mind of the Legislature, and they have not, either in terms or by implication, amended, or in any respect changed the general railroad law, or any of its provisions, by the act of 1854. (People v. Quigg, 59 N. Y., 83 ; In re Comm’rs of Central Park, 50 Id., 493.)

The appeal must be dismissed.

All concur.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Ex Rel. Fink v. Tod
1 F.2d 246 (Second Circuit, 1924)
In re Daly
116 A.D. 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
People ex rel. Terry v. Keller
35 A.D. 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Casterton v. Town of Vienna
44 N.Y.S. 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Reynolds v. City of Niagara Falls
30 N.Y.S. 954 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
People ex rel. Trustees of St. Patrick's Cathedral v. Davren
16 N.Y.S. 794 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
In re Saratoga Electric Railway Co.
12 N.Y.S. 318 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Aldinger v. Pugh
10 N.Y.S. 684 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
In re Appointment of Park Commissioners
1 N.Y.S. 763 (Superior Court of Buffalo, 1888)
People v. McCall
65 How. Pr. 442 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
People v. Burleigh
1 N.Y. Crim. 522 (New York Supreme Court, 1883)
Greene v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
16 Jones & S. 333 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1882)
McKenna v. Edmundstone
10 Daly 410 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1882)
In re Wacher
62 How. Pr. 352 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
In the Matter, Etc., of P.P. C.I.R.R. Co.
85 N.Y. 489 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
In re Prospect Park & Coney Island Railroad
85 N.Y. 489 (New York Court of Appeals, 1881)
Dewey v. Central Car & Manufacturing Co.
4 N.W. 179 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 N.Y. 209, 1877 N.Y. LEXIS 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-president-managers-company-of-the-delaware-hudson-canal-co-ny-1877.