In re the Marriage of Warnock
This text of 963 P.2d 743 (In re the Marriage of Warnock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirmed this case without opinion, 153 Or App 703, 957 P2d 1230 (1998), and wife has petitioned for reconsideration of our award of “costs, not including attorney fees” to her. We allow the petition and delete the phrase “not including attorney fees.” Request for attorney fees must now be made by motion to this court following the decision on the merits. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc., 327 Or 84, 957 P2d 1200, on recons 327 Or 185, 957 P2d 1207 (1998); Short and Short, 155 Or App 5, 964 P2d 1033 (1998).
Reconsideration allowed; phrase “not including attorney fees” deleted from disposition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
963 P.2d 743, 155 Or. App. 299, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-marriage-of-warnock-orctapp-1998.