In re the Marriage of Warnock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

In re the Marriage of Warnock

963 P.2d 743, 155 Or. App. 299, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1259

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 22, 1998·No. 96-30405; CA A97713·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

We affirmed this case without opinion, 153 Or App 703, 957 P2d 1230 (1998), and wife has petitioned for reconsideration of our award of “costs, not including attorney fees” to her. We allow the petition and delete the phrase “not including attorney fees.” Request for attorney fees must now be made by motion to this court following the decision on the merits. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc., 327 Or 84, 957 P2d 1200, on recons 327 Or 185, 957 P2d 1207 (1998); Short and Short, 155 Or App 5, 964 P2d 1033 (1998).

Reconsideration allowed; phrase “not including attorney fees” deleted from disposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

We affirmed this case without opinion, 153 Or App 703, 957 P2d 1230 (1998), and wife has petitioned for reconsideration of our award of “costs, not including attorney fees” to her. We allow the petition and delete the phrase “not including attorney fees.” Request for attorney fees must now be made by motion to this court following the decision on the merits. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc., 327 Or 84, 957 P2d 1200, on recons 327 Or 185, 957 P2d 1207 (1998); Short and Short, 155 Or App 5, 964 P2d 1033 (1998).

Reconsideration allowed; phrase “not including attorney fees” deleted from disposition.

In re the Marriage of Warnock, 963 P.2d 743, 155 Or. App. 299, 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1259 (Or. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

963 P.2d 743 (In re the Marriage of Warnock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related