In re the Marriage of Copenhaver
687 P.2d 1086, 69 Or. App. 333, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3934
Opinion
This is a dissolution of marriage case. Husband is a circuit court judge. His financial circumstances — and, thus, the merits of this case — may have been significantly altered by an enactment of Or Laws 1983, ch 770, but it is not possible on this record to determine just what the effect of that measure is. This is, therefore, the rare case in which, in order to do justice between the parties, remand is necessary. See Sands and Sands, 64 Or App 570, 669 P2d 358 (1983).
Remanded for further proceedings. Costs to neither party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Marriage of Copenhaver, 687 P.2d 1086, 69 Or. App. 333, 1984 Ore. App. LEXIS 3934 (Or. Ct. App. 1984).
687 P.2d 1086 (In re the Marriage of Copenhaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Marriage of Copenhaver
713 P.2d 685 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1986)