In re the Marriage of Copenhaver

713 P.2d 685, 77 Or. App. 504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re the Marriage of Copenhaver. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 Or. App. 333
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 29, 1986·No. 81 608; CA A36105·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This dissolution case is before us again following our remand to consider the effect of Or Laws 1983, ch 766, on the financial circumstances of husband, who is a circuit court judge. 69 Or App 333, 687 P2d 1086 (1984). We are now satisfied that the value of husband’s retirement benefits was properly considered as part of the marital assets in the trial court’s making an approximately equal property division, as it should have done.

We consider only wife’s contention that spousal support should be permanent. The original decree awarded her $600 per month for 18 months; on remand, the court extended it to 24 months. We conclude that, given the length of the marriage and the substantial difference in the parties’ earning capacities, wife should be awarded spousal support of $600 per month until husband retires, at which time it will cease.

Decree modified to provide that husband shall pay wife $600 per month spousal support until he retires; otherwise affirmed. Costs to wife.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Copenhaver, 713 P.2d 685, 77 Or. App. 504 (Or. Ct. App. 1986).

713 P.2d 685 (In re the Marriage of Copenhaver) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Marriage of Copenhaver
687 P.2d 1086 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1984)