In re the Marriage of Bond

666 P.2d 861, 63 Or. App. 865
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided July 13, 1983·No. 25030; CA A25910·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from a final order modifying the original dissolution decree by changing custody of the parties’ two sons to father. We affirm.

Father appeals from a subsequent order awarding mother a judgment for attorney fees and costs. That order was entered after mother filed her notice of appeal from the order on the merits. Because we have held that, once a notice of appeal has been filed, the trial court does not have jurisdiction to enter a judgment for costs and attorney fees, Truax and Truax, 62 Or App 130, 659 P2d 983 (1983); Fenn and Fenn, 63 Or App 506, 664 P2d 1143 (1983), we reverse that order.

Affirmed on mother’s appeal; reversed on father’s appeal. No costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Marriage of Bond, 666 P.2d 861, 63 Or. App. 865 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).

666 P.2d 861 (In re the Marriage of Bond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Portland v. Carriage Inn
669 P.2d 1185 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)