Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts Smith

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts Smith

254 A.D. 810, 5 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7706
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1938·Published

Opinion

Decree reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Roséboom v. Billington (17 Johns, 181, 187); Hulbert v. Nichol (20 Hun, 454, 457); Decker v. Zeluff (23 App. Div. 107,109,110); Mills v. Davis (113 N. Y. 243, 247); Purdy v. Purdy (47 App. Div. 94, 96); Matter of Burrows (139 Mise. 802; 804; affd., as modfd., 235 App. Div. 764, revd., and decree of Surrogate affd., 259 N. Y. 449); United States Trust Company v. Stanton (76 Hun, 32; affd., 145 N. Y. 620), Matter of City of New York (239 id. 220; 225.) All concur. (The decree adjudges a claim against an estate to be valid.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts Smith, 254 A.D. 810, 5 N.Y.S.2d 549, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 810 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Trust Company v. . Stanton
40 N.E. 165 (New York Court of Appeals, 1895)
In Re the Accounting of Burrows
182 N.E. 79 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Mills v. . Davis
21 N.E. 68 (New York Court of Appeals, 1889)
Decker v. Zeluff
23 A.D. 107 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Purdy v. Purdy
47 A.D. 94 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
United States Trust Co. v. Stanton
27 N.Y.S. 614 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)