In Re the Accounting of Burrows

182 N.E. 79, 259 N.Y. 449, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 966
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 19, 1932·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find in the language of the will when read in connection with the codicils, a clear intent on the part of the testator that the children of his deceased son, Lorenzo Burrows, who are of his next-of-kin, should take under his will by right of substitution. (Matter of Evans, 234 N. Y. 42.)

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decree of the Surrogate’s Court affirmed, with *452 costs in the Appellate Division and in this court, payable out of the estate.

Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur; Pound, Ch. J., not voting.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Accounting of Burrows, 182 N.E. 79, 259 N.Y. 449, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 966 (N.Y. 1932).

182 N.E. 79 (In Re the Accounting of Burrows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Shannon
107 A.D.2d 1084 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
In re the Estate of Milerand
46 Misc. 2d 332 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1965)
Wagner v. Cook
206 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
In Re Estate of Cook
206 A.2d 865 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1965)
In re the Accounting of Meyer
195 Misc. 705 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1949)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts Smith
254 A.D. 810 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the Fifth Avenue Bank
254 A.D. 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
In re the Estate of Denari
165 Misc. 450 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1937)
In re the Estate of Hook
158 Misc. 771 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)