In Re the Accounting of Burrows
Opinion
We find in the language of the will when read in connection with the codicils, a clear intent on the part of the testator that the children of his deceased son, Lorenzo Burrows, who are of his next-of-kin, should take under his will by right of substitution. (Matter of Evans, 234 N. Y. 42.)
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the decree of the Surrogate’s Court affirmed, with *452 costs in the Appellate Division and in this court, payable out of the estate.
Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien, Hubbs and Crouch, JJ., concur; Pound, Ch. J., not voting.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
182 N.E. 79 (In Re the Accounting of Burrows) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.