In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the United States Trust Co.

2 Mills Surr. 367, 36 Misc. 378, 73 N.Y.S. 635
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 Mills Surr. 367 (In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the United States Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the United States Trust Co., 2 Mills Surr. 367, 36 Misc. 378, 73 N.Y.S. 635 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Opinion

ThoMas, S’.

— The interest of each remainderman in the fund set apart for the trust created by the testator for the benefit of his daughter, Mrs. Spencer, during her life, consisted in a right to share in the distribution and division which the trustee was directed to make on the death or remarriage of Mrs. Spencer. Such interests were, therefore, contingent upon the existence of such remainderman when the time for distribution arrived. Matter of Crane, 164 N. Y. 71. The assignees of Caroline E. Sullivant and of Mary S. Allen will, therefore, take nothing. The word issue,” in its general sense, imports descendants to an indefinite degree. When used in relation to the word “parent,” it has been sometimes construed as synonymous with children, but this rule of construction has not always been followed, and when applied to. wills easily yields to slight considerations of probable testamentary intention. United States Trust Co. v. Tobias, 21 Abb. N. C. [370]*370392; Soper v. Brown, 136 N. Y. 244. I conclude that, as used and intended by tbe testator in this case, the word issue ” means “ descendants,” and that in the division now about to be made the eldest living representatives of the stock of each of the testator’s eight daughters referred to by him as my said daughters,” and thus excluding the descendants of the daughter who predeceased him, are entitled to share, those representing a deceased daughter taking per stirpes and not per capita. The decree proposed will be corrected to meet this view and again noticed for settlement.

Decreed accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freund v. Schilling
6 S.W.2d 673 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1928)
In re the Probate of the Will of Schuster
14 Misc. 534 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1920)
In Re the Accounting of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
107 N.E. 340 (New York Court of Appeals, 1914)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceeding of Bauerdorf
9 Mills Surr. 465 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Mills Surr. 367, 36 Misc. 378, 73 N.Y.S. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-judicial-settlement-of-the-accounts-of-the-united-states-trust-nysurct-1901.