In re the Fee Agreement of Smith
5 Vet. App. 307, 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 336
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided August 5, 1993·No. Nos. 91-1058, 93-44 and 92-1385·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinions
ORDER
On consideration of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) motion for en banc review of the Court’s panel * opinion dated April 8, 1993, it is
ORDERED that the Secretary’s motion for en banc review is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Fee Agreement of Smith, 5 Vet. App. 307, 1993 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 336 (Cal. 1993).
5 Vet. App. 307 (In re the Fee Agreement of Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. Principi
15 Vet. App. 280 (Veterans Claims, 2001)
Carpenter v. Principi
15 Vet. App. 64 (Veterans Claims, 2001)
Snyder v. Gober
14 Vet. App. 148 (Veterans Claims, 2000)
Snyder v. West
13 Vet. App. 244 (Veterans Claims, 1999)
Hazan v. Gober
10 Vet. App. 511 (Veterans Claims, 1997)
Wright v. Gober
10 Vet. App. 343 (Veterans Claims, 1997)
In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Bruce Tyler Wick. Bruce Tyler Wick, Movant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
40 F.3d 367 (Federal Circuit, 1994)